[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374955389.2923.101.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:03:09 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: "jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have
people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:01 -0400, jonsmirl@...il.com wrote:
>
> Much cleaner to modify dtc to take a schema as part of the compilation
> process. The schema language itself has no requirement to look like
> DTS syntax. Whoever wrote dtc probably has a favorite language that
> would be good for writing schemas in.
Yes, we *definitely* want dtc to be doing the validation when it builds
trees. And warning (and needing an additional and suitably scarily named
command line option) if you try to build something *without* a schema.
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5745 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists