linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/79] 3.10.4-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130727005710.GA13693@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:57:10 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/79] 3.10.4-stable review

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:19:24AM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 03:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.4 release.
> > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Jul 28 20:45:08 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.4-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> 
> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.87, 3.4.54 and 3.10.3
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
>      (3.4.55-rc1, 3.10.4-rc2)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
>      (3.0.88-rc1, 3.4.55-rc1, and 3.10.4-rc1)
> 
> dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the 
> previous dmesgs for each of these releases. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, 
> err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Great, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/