[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F4D18A.7080605@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:38:42 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: stable 3-10-3: strange output of "lsmod | grep ^acpi_cpufreq"
On 07/28/2013 01:38 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 07/28/2013 01:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 27, 2013 07:40:34 PM Toralf Förster wrote:
>>> it gives at a ThinkPad T420:
>>>
>>> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ lsmod | grep ^acpi_cpufreq
>>> acpi_cpufreq 12902 2147483647
>>
>> That is -1, which indicates some module refcount woes.
>>
>> I definitely can't see that with the mainline on my machines.
>
> It might be a regression in -stable only, b/c in 3,10.2 I did not
> observed it.
>
> Srivatsa,
>
> by any chance - could the revert of the cpufreq patches have something
> to do with that ?
>
Hmmm? Those reverts didn't touch anything related to module
refcounts.. So I don't think they have anything to do with this.
Also, is the issue related to suspend/resume at all? (Sorry, I don't
have your original email, so I'm not sure what the exact issue is).
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists