[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130729064108.GF4284@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:41:08 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, dholsgrove@...inx.com,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [microblaze-linux] [RESEND PATCH v2] microblaze: Fix clone
syscall
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:22:56AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Microblaze was assign to CLONE_BACKWARDS type where
> parent tid was passed via 3rd argument.
> Microblaze glibc is using 4th argument for it.
>
> Create new CLONE_BACKWARDS3 type where stack_size is passed
> via 3rd argument, parent thread id pointer via 4th,
> child thread id pointer via 5th and tls value as 6th
> argument
>
> Inconsistency was introduced by this patch:
> "microblaze: switch to generic fork/vfork/clone"
> (sha1: f3268edbe6fe0ce56e62c6d6b14640aeb04864b7)
I still don't think this is clear. I would suggest language like:
==
Fix inadvertent breakage in the clone syscall ABI for Microblaze
that was introduced in this patch:
"microblaze: switch to generic fork/vfork/clone"
(sha1: f3268edbe6fe0ce56e62c6d6b14640aeb04864b7)
The Microblaze syscall ABI for clone takes the parent tid address in
the 4th argument; the third argument slot is used for the stack size.
The incorrectly-used CLONE_BACKWARDS type assigned parent tid to the
3rd slot.
This commit restores the original ABI so that existing userspace libc
code will work correctly.
==
And maybe add something about which versions were affected by the
breakage.
Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists