[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130729164820.38c47ee56d98d67debc77f97@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:48:20 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:40:28 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, unfortunately those issues are a good proportion of what gets
> caught by this sort of testing that wouldn't get caught in normal
> development so it doesn't seem worth doing something that won't at least
> give a linking kernel.
The problem is that you are impacting on other people's testing. Even if
this stuff builds for me, it may well break for people using other
arches/configs. These changes (adding dependencies on
CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST for devices that are currently only built for
particular platforms) are adding very little, but impacting on my time (at
least).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists