[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomCHufjzatndpB0MEHn_jOREUZ5dcaQa0BegLAwOjP-1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:33:43 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, durgadoss.r@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list
On 26 July 2013 18:16, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> So instead of reading policies from per_cpu variables for all online
> cpus, you think of using the list explicitly.
>
> Good idea, but can we first finish the boost patches? Such change can
> be applied on top of boost patch series as well.
Its not a problem where we do it. But making sure that we do it :)
If you need to resend this patchset, then that list can be used at the
place I just highlighted.. Change isn't big and so shouldn't be a problem.
Otherwise it might get missed by both of us.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists