[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130729093519.GB319@Robin-OptiPlex-780>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:35:21 +0800
From: Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: pfuze100: Use regulator_map_voltage_ascend
Yes, it's reasonable from performance view.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:38:58PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> All table based voltage list have ascendant order.
> Use regulator_map_voltage_ascend for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> index e9e8ae3..dbb6e1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops = {
>
> static struct regulator_ops pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops = {
> .list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table,
> + .map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
> .set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
> .get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
>
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists