[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F640AB.2050709@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:15:07 +0100
From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
linaro-acpi <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@...aro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM64: add cpu topology definition
On 29/07/13 10:46, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 27 July 2013 12:42, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Power aware scheduling needs the cpu topology information to improve the
>> cpu scheduler decision making.
>
> It's not only power aware scheduling. The scheduler already uses
> topology and cache sharing when CONFIG_SCHED_MC and/or
> CONFIG_SCHED_SMT are enable. So you should also add these configs for
> arm64 so the scheduler can use it
>
Just for my knowledge, I thought power aware using SCHED_MC/SMT was
removed. I see commit 8e7fbcbc22c12414bcc9dfdd683637f58fb32759 "sched:
Remove stale power aware scheduling remnants and dysfunctional knobs"
I may be missing something here.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists