| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:18:28 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:43:13PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 14:14 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 20:09 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 25 2013, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 12:16 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:10:36PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > > > Np. FYI, you'll want to use the latest commit e7827b351 HEAD from
> > > > > > target-pending/scsi-mq, which now has functioning scsi-generic support.
> > > > >
> > > > > Survives a boot, a kernel build and the build's result :)
> > > >
> > > > Great. Thanks for the feedback Alexander!
> > > >
> > > > So the next step on my end is to enable -mq for ahci, and verify initial
> > > > correctness using QEMU/KVM hardware emulation.
> > > >
> > > > Btw, I've been looking at enabling the SHT->cmd_size for struct
> > > > ata_queued_cmd descriptor pre-allocation, but AFAICT these descriptors
> > > > are already all pre-allocated by libata and obtained via ata_qc_new() ->
> > > > __ata_qc_from_tag() during ata_scsi_queuecmd().
> > >
> > > Might still not be a bad idea to do it:
> > >
> > > - Cleans up a driver, getting rid of the need to alloc, maintain, and
> > > free those structures.
> > >
> > > - Should be some cache locality benefits to having it all sequential.
> > >
> >
> > Looking at this some more, there are a number of locations outside of
> > the main blk_mq_ops->queue_rq() -> SHT->queuecommand_mq() dispatch that
> > use *ata_qc_from_tag() to obtain *ata_queued_cmd, and a few without a
> > associated struct scsi_cmnd like libata-core.c:ata_exec_internal_sg()
> > for example..
> >
> > So I don't think (completely) getting rid of ata_port->qcmds[] will be
> > possible, and just converting the ata_scsi_queuecmd() path to use the
> > extra SHT->cmd_size pre-allocation for *ata_queued_cmd might end up
> > being more trouble that it's worth. Still undecided on that part..
> >
> > Tejun, do you have any thoughts + input here..?
> >
>
> OK, so I decided to give this a shot anyways.. Here is a quick
> conversion for libata + AHCI to use blk-mq -> scsi-mq pre-allocation for
> ata_queued_cmd descriptors:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 2b50dfd..61b3db8 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ static int ahci_pci_device_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>
> static struct scsi_host_template ahci_sht = {
> AHCI_SHT("ahci"),
> + .scsi_mq = true,
> + .cmd_size = sizeof(struct ata_queued_cmd),
> + .queuecommand_mq = ata_scsi_queuecmd,
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index f218427..e21814d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -4725,29 +4725,25 @@ void swap_buf_le16(u16 *buf, unsigned int buf_words)
> /**
> * ata_qc_new - Request an available ATA command, for queueing
> * @ap: target port
> + * @sc: incoming scsi_cmnd descriptor
> *
> * LOCKING:
> * None.
> */
>
> -static struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new(struct ata_port *ap)
> +static struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new(struct ata_port *ap,
> + struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
> {
> struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = NULL;
> - unsigned int i;
> + struct request *rq = sc->request;
>
> /* no command while frozen */
> if (unlikely(ap->pflags & ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN))
> return NULL;
>
> - /* the last tag is reserved for internal command. */
> - for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1; i++)
blk-mq does not prevent tag ATA_TAG_INTERNAL from being using. Would it make
sense to promote queue depth of length (ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1) while always
pointing ATA_TAG_INTERNAL to qcmd (see below)?
> - if (!test_and_set_bit(i, &ap->qc_allocated)) {
ata_port::qc_allocated becomes redundant.
> - qc = __ata_qc_from_tag(ap, i);
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (qc)
> - qc->tag = i;
> + qc = (struct ata_queued_cmd *)sc->SCp.ptr;
> + qc->scsicmd = sc;
> + qc->tag = rq->tag;
>
> return qc;
> }
> @@ -4755,19 +4751,20 @@ static struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new(struct ata_port *ap)
> /**
> * ata_qc_new_init - Request an available ATA command, and initialize it
> * @dev: Device from whom we request an available command structure
> + * @sc: incoming scsi_cmnd descriptor
> *
> * LOCKING:
> * None.
> */
>
> -struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_init(struct ata_device *dev)
> +struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_init(struct ata_device *dev,
> + struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
> {
> struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
> struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>
> - qc = ata_qc_new(ap);
> + qc = ata_qc_new(ap, sc);
> if (qc) {
> - qc->scsicmd = NULL;
> qc->ap = ap;
> qc->dev = dev;
>
> @@ -4797,10 +4794,9 @@ void ata_qc_free(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
>
> qc->flags = 0;
> tag = qc->tag;
> - if (likely(ata_tag_valid(tag))) {
> +
> + if (likely(ata_tag_valid(tag)))
> qc->tag = ATA_TAG_POISON;
> - clear_bit(tag, &ap->qc_allocated);
> - }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 0101af5..e5ab880 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -742,9 +742,8 @@ static struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_scsi_qc_new(struct ata_device *dev,
> {
> struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>
> - qc = ata_qc_new_init(dev);
> + qc = ata_qc_new_init(dev, cmd);
> if (qc) {
> - qc->scsicmd = cmd;
> qc->scsidone = cmd->scsi_done;
>
> qc->sg = scsi_sglist(cmd);
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
> index c949dd3..4cd88af 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ extern struct ata_link *ata_dev_phys_link(struct ata_device *dev);
> extern void ata_force_cbl(struct ata_port *ap);
> extern u64 ata_tf_to_lba(const struct ata_taskfile *tf);
> extern u64 ata_tf_to_lba48(const struct ata_taskfile *tf);
> -extern struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_init(struct ata_device *dev);
> +extern struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_init(struct ata_device *dev,
> + struct scsi_cmnd *sc);
> extern int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev,
> u64 block, u32 n_block, unsigned int tf_flags,
> unsigned int tag);
> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
> index eae7a05..52e9e9e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> @@ -35,9 +35,13 @@
> #include <linux/ata.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi_device.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/cdrom.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> +#include <../../block/blk-mq.h>
>
> /*
> * Define if arch has non-standard setup. This is a _PCI_ standard
> @@ -1500,9 +1504,26 @@ static inline void ata_qc_set_polling(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> static inline struct ata_queued_cmd *__ata_qc_from_tag(struct ata_port *ap,
> unsigned int tag)
> {
> - if (likely(ata_tag_valid(tag)))
> - return &ap->qcmd[tag];
> - return NULL;
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = ap->link.device[0].sdev;
> + struct request_queue *q = sdev->request_queue;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ata_tag_valid(tag)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (likely(sdev->host->hostt->scsi_mq)) {
Together with the comment above:
if (likely(sdev->host->hostt->scsi_mq && (tag != ATA_TAG_INTERNAL))) {
...
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, ctx->cpu);
> + struct request *rq;
> + struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
> +
> + BUG_ON(tag > hctx->queue_depth);
> +
> + rq = hctx->rqs[tag];
> + qc = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq) + sizeof(struct scsi_cmnd);
> + blk_mq_put_ctx(ctx);
> + return qc;
> + }
> + return &ap->qcmd[tag];
> }
I also tried to make a "quick" conversion and hit the same issue(s) as you.
Generally, I am concerned with these assumptions in such approach:
1. While libata concept of tags matches nicely with blk-mq (blk_mq_hw_ctx::
rqs[] vs ata_port::qcmd[]) right now, it is too exposed to changes in blk-mq
in the long run. I.e. ata_link::sactive limits tags to indices, while tags
might become hashes. Easily fixable, but still.
2. Unallocated requests in blk-mq are accessed/analized from libata-eh.c as
result of such iterations:
for (tag = 0; tag < ATA_MAX_QUEUE; tag++) {
qc = __ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag);
if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED))
continue;
...
}
While it is probably okay right now, it is still based on a premise that
blk-mq will not change the contents/concept of "payload", i.e. from embedded
to (re-)allocated memory.
> The thing that I'm hung up on now for existing __ata_qc_from_tag() usage
> outside of the main blk_mq_ops->queue_rq -> SHT->queuecommand_mq()
> dispatch path, is how to actually locate the underlying scsi_device ->
> request_queue -> blk_mq_ctx -> blk_mq_hw_hctx from the passed
> ata_port..?
I am actually in favor of getting rid of ata_queued_cmd::tag. Converting
ata_link::sactive to a list, making ata_link::active_tag as struct
ata_queued_cmd *ata_link::active_qc and converting ata_port::qc_allocated to a
list seems solves it all, including [2]. Have not checked it though.
Anyway, if we need a blk-mq tag (why?), we have qc->scsicmd->request->tag.
> Considering there can be more than a single ata_device hanging off each
> ata_port, the '*sdev = ap->link.device[0].sdev' in __ata_qc_from_tag()
> is definitely bogus, but I'm not sure how else to correlate
> blk-mq/scsi-mq per device descriptors to existing code expecting
> ata_port->qcmd[] descriptors to be shared across multiple devices..
>
> Tejun..?
>
> --nab
>
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists