[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F656CC.10104@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:49:32 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jeremy Eder <jeder@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
youquan.song@...el.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
len.brown@...el.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea
>
> Beside that, on ARM the cpus could be coupled and the timer to detect
> the prediction will wake up the entire cluster, making the power saving
> less efficient and impacting the statistics of the other cpu.
an ARM specific governor would be quite appropriate in that case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists