linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: oxygen: Updating jack implementation according new ALSA Jacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hehahftxx.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:10:18 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Felipe Tonello <eu@...ipetonello.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Henningsson <david.henningsson@...onical.com>,
	Wang Xingchao <xingchao.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: oxygen: Updating jack implementation according new ALSA Jacks

At Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:02:51 -0700,
Felipe Tonello wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:33AM -0700, Felipe F. Tonello wrote:
> >> From: "Felipe F. Tonello" <eu@...ipetonello.com>
> >>
> >> ALSA standard jacks already are implemented using ALSA KControl.
> >> So there is no need implement that itself or to use snd_jack
> >> for input events only.
> >
> > Similar changlog comment as on the ASoC patch and...
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >
> >>       snd_jack_new(chip->card, "Headphone",
> >> -                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, &data->hp_jack);
> >> +                  SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, 0, &data->hp_jack);
> >>       xonar_ds_handle_hp_jack(chip);
> >
> > ...this really ought to be done as part of the commit that adds the
> > parameter since it breaks the build until this patch is applied.
> 
> But that's why is a patch series. But as you say, are you suggesting
> me to propose this changes in one patch only?

The basic rule of the patch series is:
- they are split in a logical manner
- each commit must not break the build

The second rule is important especially for bisection and
backporting.  You could have done in a different way (e.g. adding a
new function like snd_jack_new_with_index() instead of changing
snd_jack_new() itself).  Which way is better, depends on the
implementation details.


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/