[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130729144124.GC2417@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:41:25 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dove: relocate internal registers device nodes
Sebastian,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:53PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> With mbus node in place, now relocate all internal device nodes
> to internal-regs node with proper address ranges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> ---
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi | 955 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 474 insertions(+), 481 deletions(-)
>
I think you might do this in a slightly different way, and achieve a
less intrusive patch (fwiw, i personally try to avoid intrusive changes).
Maybe it's just a matter of taste, so it's up to you to decide
Anyway, here's my proposal:
----------------------------8<----------------------------------------
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi
index db9ae00..0fbc30e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
/ {
compatible = "marvell,dove";
model = "Marvell Armada 88AP510 SoC";
+ interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
aliases {
gpio0 = &gpio0;
@@ -41,22 +42,17 @@
MBUS_ID(0x01, 0xfd) 0 0xf8000000 0x8000000 /* BootROM 128M */
MBUS_ID(0x03, 0x01) 0 0xc8000000 0x0100000 /* CESA SRAM 1M */
MBUS_ID(0x0d, 0x00) 0 0xf0000000 0x0100000>; /* PMU SRAM 1M */
- };
+};
- soc@...00000 {
+mbus {
+ internal-regs {
compatible = "simple-bus";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
- interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
-
- ranges = <0xc8000000 0xc8000000 0x0100000 /* CESA SRAM 1M */
- 0xe0000000 0xe0000000 0x8000000 /* PCIe0 Mem 128M */
- 0xe8000000 0xe8000000 0x8000000 /* PCIe1 Mem 128M */
- 0xf0000000 0xf0000000 0x0100000 /* ScratchPad 1M */
- 0x00000000 0xf1000000 0x1000000 /* SB/NB regs 16M */
- 0xf2000000 0xf2000000 0x0100000 /* PCIe0 I/O 1M */
- 0xf2100000 0xf2100000 0x0100000 /* PCIe0 I/O 1M */
- 0xf8000000 0xf8000000 0x8000000>; /* BootROM 128M */
+ ranges = <0x00000000 MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01) 0 0x0100000 /* MBUS regs 1M */
+ 0x00800000 MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x02) 0 0x1000000 /* AXI regs 16M */
+ 0xffffe000 MBUS_ID(0x03, 0x01) 0 0x0000800 /* CESA SRAM 2k */
+ 0xfffff000 MBUS_ID(0x0d, 0x00) 0 0x0000800>; /* PMU SRAM 2k */
mbusc: mbus-ctrl@...00 {
compatible = "marvell,mbus-controller";
@@ -443,7 +439,7 @@
crypto: crypto-engine@...00 {
compatible = "marvell,orion-crypto";
reg = <0x30000 0x10000>,
- <0xc8000000 0x800>;
+ <0xffffe000 0x800>;
reg-names = "regs", "sram";
interrupts = <31>;
clocks = <&gate_clk 15>;
@@ -465,7 +461,6 @@
channel1 {
interrupts = <40>;
- dmacap,memset;
dmacap,memcpy;
dmacap,xor;
};
@@ -486,7 +481,6 @@
channel1 {
interrupts = <43>;
- dmacap,memset;
dmacap,memcpy;
dmacap,xor;
};
----------------------------------->8-----------------------------------
It has a much nicer diffstat:
arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
And in addition, it allows to see some (maybe unrelated?) changes
other than the node-relocation.
I've seen these kind of things in (e.g.) omap3-igep0020.dts, and it
seems to me it could be a cleaner way of doing this relocation.
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists