lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8738qxfm02.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:01:49 +0100
From:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To:	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	nick.cheng@...ca.com.tw
Subject: Re: [SCSI REGRESSION] 3.10.2 or 3.10.3: arcmsr failure at bootup / early userspace transition

On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:

> On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
>>> I tested this patch with ARC-1260 and F/W V1.49, no issues. Also, this
>>> patch is only in 3.10.3, but not yet in 3.10.1.
>>
>> ... and I see this problem with 3.10.3 but not 3.10.1. (Haven't tried
>> 3.10.2.)
>
> Hmm, indeed that points to this commit. I just don't see what could fail there.
>
> Could you try to run these commands with 3.10.1?
>
> # # check if reporting opcodes works
> # sg_opcodes -v  -n /dev/sdX
>
> # check ata information page
> # sg_vpd --page=0x89 /dev/sdX

If this might cause the same problem I think I'd better wait until work
is done for the day and the machine is no longer loaded, and can be
rebooted without harm...

>> No changes to arcmsr between those versions... I suspect I'll have to
>> bisect, which will be a complete pig because every failure means a hard
>> powerdown of this box. Always-on servers rarely appreciate hard
>> powerdowns :(
>>
>
> Maybe just revert this commit? Helpful would be some scsi logging to
> see which command actually fails. I guess you don't have a serial
> console?

Not at that stage, no! And, yes, a test revert of this one commit will
be the first thing I try this evening / tomorrow morning (depending on
system load).

-- 
NULL && (void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ