[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130729215141.GE32145@lenny.home.zabbo.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:51:41 -0700
From: Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] truncate: drop 'oldsize' truncate_pagecache() parameter
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void adfs_write_failed(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t to)
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
>
> if (to > inode->i_size)
> - truncate_pagecache(inode, to, inode->i_size);
> + truncate_pagecache(inode, inode->i_size);
> }
All these _write_failed() boiler plate functions still technically use
'to', so I *guess* they can stay :).
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ int btrfs_truncate_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_root *root,
>
> oldsize = i_size_read(inode);
> btrfs_i_size_write(inode, 0);
> - truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, 0);
> + truncate_pagecache(inode, 0);
But after this change 'oldsize' is set but never used. That'll generate
a warning on some versions of gcc.
Can you redo the patch with an eye to removing unused arguments and
variables further up the call stack?
- z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists