linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: Add helper to perform alloc/free of policy structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130729225402.20863.51082.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:24:11 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	rjw@...k.pl, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, toralf.foerster@....de,
	robert.jarzmik@...el.com, durgadoss.r@...el.com,
	tianyu.lan@...el.com, lantianyu1986@...il.com,
	dirk.brandewie@...il.com
Cc:	stern@...land.harvard.edu, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: Add helper to perform alloc/free of policy
 structure

Separate out the allocation of the cpufreq policy structure (along with
its error handling) to a helper function. This makes the code easier to
read and also helps with some upcoming code reorganization.

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 347aef3..0ce9e9d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -944,6 +944,37 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int sibling,
 }
 #endif
 
+static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+
+	policy = kzalloc(sizeof(*policy), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!policy)
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&policy->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+		goto err_free_policy;
+
+	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&policy->related_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+		goto err_free_cpumask;
+
+	return policy;
+
+err_free_cpumask:
+	free_cpumask_var(policy->cpus);
+err_free_policy:
+	kfree(policy);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
+	free_cpumask_var(policy->cpus);
+	kfree(policy);
+}
+
 /**
  * cpufreq_add_dev - add a CPU device
  *
@@ -997,16 +1028,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 		goto module_out;
 	}
 
-	policy = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpufreq_policy), GFP_KERNEL);
+	policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc();
 	if (!policy)
 		goto nomem_out;
 
-	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&policy->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
-		goto err_free_policy;
-
-	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&policy->related_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
-		goto err_free_cpumask;
-
 	policy->cpu = cpu;
 	policy->governor = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_GOVERNOR;
 	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -1071,11 +1096,7 @@ err_out_unregister:
 
 err_set_policy_cpu:
 	per_cpu(cpufreq_policy_cpu, cpu) = -1;
-	free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
-err_free_cpumask:
-	free_cpumask_var(policy->cpus);
-err_free_policy:
-	kfree(policy);
+	cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
 nomem_out:
 	module_put(cpufreq_driver->owner);
 module_out:
@@ -1199,9 +1220,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
 		if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
 			cpufreq_driver->exit(data);
 
-		free_cpumask_var(data->related_cpus);
-		free_cpumask_var(data->cpus);
-		kfree(data);
+		cpufreq_policy_free(data);
 	} else {
 		pr_debug("%s: removing link, cpu: %d\n", __func__, cpu);
 		cpufreq_cpu_put(data);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/