linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:26:18 -0400
From:	Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>
To:	Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
CC:	ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

On 07/30/2013 01:01 AM, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Dong,
>
> On 07/31/2013 12:00 AM, Dong Fang wrote:
>
>> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
>>> list.
>>>
>>> It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
>>> for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
>>> patch was dropped.
>>>
>>> Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
>>> message every single time.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> dan carpenter
>>>
>> sorry about that, i just think i shoud send this patch to linux-fsdevel,
>> but ./get_maintainer.pl didn't tell me
>
> It's better to send this patch to ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com only, as this
> is a specific patch for OCFS2.
>
> Also, we tag OCFS2 kernel patch with "ocfs2" in subject line rather than "fs/ocfs2".
>
> Thanks,
> -Jeff
>
thx, Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/