| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51F8054A.1030603@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:26:18 -0400 From: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com> To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com> CC: ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() On 07/30/2013 01:01 AM, Jeff Liu wrote: > Hi Dong, > > On 07/31/2013 12:00 AM, Dong Fang wrote: > >> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> Oh. It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2. Only the CC >>> list. >>> >>> It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing >>> for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his >>> patch was dropped. >>> >>> Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the >>> message every single time. >>> >>> regards, >>> dan carpenter >>> >> sorry about that, i just think i shoud send this patch to linux-fsdevel, >> but ./get_maintainer.pl didn't tell me > > It's better to send this patch to ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com only, as this > is a specific patch for OCFS2. > > Also, we tag OCFS2 kernel patch with "ocfs2" in subject line rather than "fs/ocfs2". > > Thanks, > -Jeff > thx, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists