linux-kernel - [PATCH 024/106] svcrdma: underflow issue in decode_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1375176725-5825-25-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:30:43 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 024/106] svcrdma: underflow issue in decode_write_list()

3.5.7.18 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

commit b2781e1021525649c0b33fffd005ef219da33926 upstream.

My static checker marks everything from ntohl() as untrusted and it
complains we could have an underflow problem doing:

	return (u32 *)&ary->wc_array[nchunks];

Also on 32 bit systems the upper bound check could overflow.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_marshal.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_marshal.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_marshal.c
index 8d2eddd..65b1462 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_marshal.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_marshal.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void svc_rdma_rcl_chunk_counts(struct rpcrdma_read_chunk *ch,
  */
 static u32 *decode_write_list(u32 *va, u32 *vaend)
 {
+	unsigned long start, end;
 	int nchunks;
 
 	struct rpcrdma_write_array *ary =
@@ -113,9 +114,12 @@ static u32 *decode_write_list(u32 *va, u32 *vaend)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	nchunks = ntohl(ary->wc_nchunks);
-	if (((unsigned long)&ary->wc_array[0] +
-	     (sizeof(struct rpcrdma_write_chunk) * nchunks)) >
-	    (unsigned long)vaend) {
+
+	start = (unsigned long)&ary->wc_array[0];
+	end = (unsigned long)vaend;
+	if (nchunks < 0 ||
+	    nchunks > (SIZE_MAX - start) / sizeof(struct rpcrdma_write_chunk) ||
+	    (start + (sizeof(struct rpcrdma_write_chunk) * nchunks)) > end) {
 		dprintk("svcrdma: ary=%p, wc_nchunks=%d, vaend=%p\n",
 			ary, nchunks, vaend);
 		return NULL;
@@ -129,6 +133,7 @@ static u32 *decode_write_list(u32 *va, u32 *vaend)
 
 static u32 *decode_reply_array(u32 *va, u32 *vaend)
 {
+	unsigned long start, end;
 	int nchunks;
 	struct rpcrdma_write_array *ary =
 		(struct rpcrdma_write_array *)va;
@@ -143,9 +148,12 @@ static u32 *decode_reply_array(u32 *va, u32 *vaend)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	nchunks = ntohl(ary->wc_nchunks);
-	if (((unsigned long)&ary->wc_array[0] +
-	     (sizeof(struct rpcrdma_write_chunk) * nchunks)) >
-	    (unsigned long)vaend) {
+
+	start = (unsigned long)&ary->wc_array[0];
+	end = (unsigned long)vaend;
+	if (nchunks < 0 ||
+	    nchunks > (SIZE_MAX - start) / sizeof(struct rpcrdma_write_chunk) ||
+	    (start + (sizeof(struct rpcrdma_write_chunk) * nchunks)) > end) {
 		dprintk("svcrdma: ary=%p, wc_nchunks=%d, vaend=%p\n",
 			ary, nchunks, vaend);
 		return NULL;
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/