linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Remove extra variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpok_Z943pkiyV3gFXpSpcp+gm724y3_P+fghwLRUOo-F6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:19:07 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Remove extra variables

On 30 July 2013 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 07:06:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> We call cpufreq_cpu_get() in cpufreq_add_dev_symlink() to increase usage
>> refcount of policy and not to get policy for a cpu. So, we don't really need to
>> capture the return value of this routine and call put for it later for failure
>> cases. We can simply use policy passed as an argument to this routine.
>>
>> Moreover debug print is rewritten to make it more clear.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> Both [1-2/2] look good, but what do they apply to?  Mainline, linux-next,
> my bleeding-edge branch?

Sorry for not mentioning this, bleeding-edge :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/