[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1375197464-27962-11-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:16:39 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@...el.com>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/75] Revert "drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs"
3.8.13.6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
commit 46a0b638f35b45fc13d3dc0deb6a7e17988170b2 upstream.
This reverts commit 25ff119 and the follow on for Valleyview commit 2dc8aae.
commit 25ff1195f8a0b3724541ae7bbe331b4296de9c06
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu Apr 4 21:31:03 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs
commit 2dc8aae06d53458dd3624dc0accd4f81100ee631
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Wed May 22 17:08:06 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Workaround incoherence with fence updates on Valleyview
Jon Bloomfield came up with a plausible explanation and cheap fix
(drm/i915: Fix incoherence with fence updates on Sandybridge+) for the
race condition, so lets run with it.
This is a candidate for stable as the old workaround incurs a
significant cost (calling wbinvd on all CPUs before performing the
register write) for some workloads as noted by Carsten Emde.
Link: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-June/028819.html
References: https://www.osadl.org/?id=1543#c7602
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63825
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@...el.com>
Cc: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
[ kamal: revert the 3.8.y-stable version of 25ff119:
This reverts commit b578b3a82d830e2170d403b1fb29b649e26a48fb. ]
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 28 +++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 979d892..22b5784 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2671,35 +2671,17 @@ static inline int fence_number(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs;
}
-static void i915_gem_write_fence__ipi(void *data)
-{
- wbinvd();
-}
-
static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
bool enable)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- int fence_reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
-
- /* In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and
- * the update to the fence register we need to take extreme
- * measures on SNB+. In theory, the write to the fence register
- * flushes all memory transactions before, and coupled with the
- * mb() placed around the register write we serialise all memory
- * operations with respect to the changes in the tiler. Yet, on
- * SNB+ we need to take a step further and emit an explicit wbinvd()
- * on each processor in order to manually flush all memory
- * transactions before updating the fence register.
- */
- if (HAS_LLC(obj->base.dev))
- on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, NULL, 1);
- i915_gem_write_fence(dev, fence_reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
+ int reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
+
+ i915_gem_write_fence(obj->base.dev, reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
if (enable) {
- obj->fence_reg = fence_reg;
+ obj->fence_reg = reg;
fence->obj = obj;
list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
} else {
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists