linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 04/10] pinctrl: sunxi: Wrap long compatible declaration lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1375196953.32691.61.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:09:13 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To:	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>, kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com,
	sunny@...winnertech.com, shuge@...winnertech.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 04/10] pinctrl: sunxi: Wrap long
 compatible declaration lines

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 16:59 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The compatible declaration and their associated data are exceeding the
> 80-characters width limit.
> 
> Split these lines to make them more readable and fit in the kernel
> coding guidelines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index 5985e60..246310b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -628,10 +628,22 @@ static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>  }
>  
>  static struct of_device_id sunxi_pinctrl_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pinctrl", .data = (void *)&sun4i_a10_pinctrl_data },
> -	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-pinctrl", .data = (void *)&sun5i_a10s_pinctrl_data },
> -	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-pinctrl", .data = (void *)&sun5i_a13_pinctrl_data },
> -	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-pinctrl", .data = (void *)&sun6i_a31_pinctrl_data },
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pinctrl",
> +		.data = (void *)&sun4i_a10_pinctrl_data,
> +	},

I'm not sure this is actually an improvement, the original reads quite
naturally even if it is a little long. What about a #define such that
you can write:
         COMPAT("allwinner,sun4i-a10-pinctrl", sun4i_a10_pinctrl_data),
and thereby stay within 80-chars?

If you wanted to go overboard you could code the macro such that:
        SUNXI_COMPAT(sun4i,a10),
expanded to what you want, that's pretty obfuscated though.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/