[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130730155212.GB32226@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:52:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] perf: add ability to sample physical data addresses
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:21:41PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Peter,
>
> One thing that bothers me with the MMAP2 approach is that
> it forces integration into perf.
This is a good (TM) thing, yes? ;-)
> Now, you will need to analyze
> the MMAP2 records. With my sample_type approach, you
> simply needed a cmdline option on perf record, and then
> you could dump the sample using perf report -D and feed
> them into a post-processing script. But now, the analysis
> needs to be integrated into perf or the tool needs to parse
> the full perf.data file.
So the disadvantage of the sample_type approach is that it generates
more data and bloats the fast path.
If its useful it shouldn't live in a script anyway ;-) Also if the
script muck can't deal with the side-band information its a worse broken
piece of crap than I thought it was.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists