[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F72D55.7050108@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:04:53 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Checkpatch error on trace events macros
On 2013/7/30 10:36, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 10:06 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> On 2013/7/30 9:58, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> So what are these TRACE_<FOO> defines that need
>>> excluding from the "complex values" check?
>>>
>>> Anything other than
>>>
>>> TRACE_SYSTEM
>>> TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
>>> TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
>>> only has those 3.
>>>
>>
>> Try:
>> # scripts/checkpatch.pl --file include/trace/events/*
>>
>> You'll see numerous errors. :)
>
> Nope, you'll see numerous whitespace defects, but no
> actual errors.
>
> If you run with:
>
> --ignore=spacing,long_line,code_indent,leading_space,printf_l,split_string,space_before_tab,trailing_whitespace,line_continuations
>
Serious? I'd just not run checkpatch.pl. ;)
> it's flawless.
>
The "complex values" check complaints come from many places in include/trace/events/*,
and I'm not going to check where and why.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists