[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mwp3q4vo.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 23:58:27 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] migrate: make core migration code aware of hugepage
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> writes:
> Before enabling each user of page migration to support hugepage,
> this patch enables the list of pages for migration to link not only
> LRU pages, but also hugepages. As a result, putback_movable_pages()
> and migrate_pages() can handle both of LRU pages and hugepages.
>
> ChangeLog v4:
> - make some macros return 'do {} while(0)'
> - use more readable variable name
>
> ChangeLog v3:
> - revert introducing migrate_movable_pages
> - add isolate_huge_page
>
> ChangeLog v2:
> - move code removing VM_HUGETLB from vma_migratable check into a
> separate patch
> - hold hugetlb_lock in putback_active_hugepage
> - update comment near the definition of hugetlb_lock
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/migrate.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git v3.11-rc1.orig/include/linux/hugetlb.h v3.11-rc1/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index c2b1801..c7a14a4 100644
> --- v3.11-rc1.orig/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ v3.11-rc1/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ int hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long from, long to,
> vm_flags_t vm_flags);
> void hugetlb_unreserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long offset, long freed);
> int dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page(struct page *page);
> +bool isolate_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list);
> +void putback_active_hugepage(struct page *page);
> +void putback_active_hugepages(struct list_head *list);
are we using putback_active_hugepages in the patch series ?
> void copy_huge_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
> @@ -134,6 +137,9 @@ static inline int dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page(struct page *page)
> return 0;
> }
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists