[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1375209919-1768-20-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:44:57 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 53/75] neighbour: fix a race in neigh_destroy()
3.8.13.6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit c9ab4d85de222f3390c67aedc9c18a50e767531e ]
There is a race in neighbour code, because neigh_destroy() uses
skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue) without holding neighbour lock,
while other parts of the code assume neighbour rwlock is what
protects arp_queue
Convert all skb_queue_purge() calls to the __skb_queue_purge() variant
Use __skb_queue_head_init() instead of skb_queue_head_init()
to make clear we do not use arp_queue.lock
And hold neigh->lock in neigh_destroy() to close the race.
Reported-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index c815f28..8f9a6c6 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device *dev)
we must kill timers etc. and move
it to safe state.
*/
- skb_queue_purge(&n->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&n->arp_queue);
n->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
n->output = neigh_blackhole;
if (n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static struct neighbour *neigh_alloc(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device
if (!n)
goto out_entries;
- skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
rwlock_init(&n->lock);
seqlock_init(&n->ha_lock);
n->updated = n->used = now;
@@ -724,7 +724,9 @@ void neigh_destroy(struct neighbour *neigh)
if (neigh_del_timer(neigh))
pr_warn("Impossible event\n");
- skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ write_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ write_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
neigh->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_neigh_destroy)
@@ -870,7 +872,7 @@ static void neigh_invalidate(struct neighbour *neigh)
neigh->ops->error_report(neigh, skb);
write_lock(&neigh->lock);
}
- skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
neigh->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
}
@@ -1222,7 +1224,7 @@ int neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr, u8 new,
write_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
}
- skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
neigh->arp_queue_len_bytes = 0;
}
out:
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists