linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/binfmts: Better handling of binfmt loops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130730140446.1a4982e21ac8e183c65e9ed1@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:04:46 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Zach Levis <zml@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Zach Levis <zach@...hsthings.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/binfmts: Better handling of binfmt loops

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:40:44 -0700 Zach Levis <zml@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> With these changes, when a binfmt loop is encountered,
> the ELOOP will propogate back to the 0 depth. At this point the
> argv and argc values will be reset to what they were originally and an
> attempt is made to continue with the following binfmt handlers.

hm, why?  What problem does this fix?  What value does the change offer
to our users?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/