[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130730231533.GA26824@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:15:33 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ARM ATTEND] catching up on exploit
mitigations
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:11:20AM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:14:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > - fuzzing (is anyone running trinity or similar on the ARM tree?)
> >
> > Someone was kind enough to send me an arm chromebook, so I tried this just
> > last week (albeit, on the 3.4 kernel it shipped with). The results make
> > me think the answer is a resounding 'no'.
>
> Shouldn't you run trinity only under QEMU or similar virtual
> environment? Don't know about chromebook, but on some of my ARM boards
> a misbehaving kernel could at least in theory brick the board...
I like to live dangerously. Don't imitate everything you see on TV,
or read about on lkml.
More seriously, that's true if you're running trinity as root, which
yes, I usually advise people only do in qemu etc.
If you're running it as a regular user and you can brick the board,
you might have bigger problems.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists