[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130730233722.GA28747@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:37:23 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix lockdep splat caused by pmd sharing
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:35:30AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > which is a false positive caused by hugetlb pmd sharing code which
> > allocates a new pmd from withing mappint->i_mmap_mutex. If this
> > allocation causes reclaim then the lockdep detector complains that we
> > might self-deadlock.
> >
> > This is not correct though, because hugetlb pages are not reclaimable so
> > their mapping will be never touched from the reclaim path.
> >
> > The patch tells lockup detector that hugetlb i_mmap_mutex is special
> > by assigning it a separate lockdep class so it won't report possible
> > deadlocks on unrelated mappings.
> >
> > [peterz@...radead.org: comment for annotation]
> > Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks, Michal!
> Only remained thing is Dave's testing.
I've added it to my builds, all is quiet so far..
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists