linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] ARM: edma: Don't clear EMR of channel in edma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51F89B0B.4080803@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:05:15 -0500
From:	Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
To:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
CC:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
	Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
	Matt Porter <matt@...orter.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>,
	Benoit Cousson <benoit.cousson@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Balaji TK <balajitk@...com>,
	Gururaja Hebbar <gururaja.hebbar@...com>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
	Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux DaVinci Kernel List 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] ARM: edma: Don't clear EMR of channel in edma_stop

On 07/30/2013 03:29 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 29 July 2013 06:59 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> We certainly don't want error conditions to be cleared anywhere
> 
> 'anywhere' is a really loaded term.
> 
>> as this will make us 'forget' about missed events. We depend on
>> knowing which events were missed in order to be able to reissue them.
> 
>> This fixes a race condition where the EMR was being cleared
>> by the transfer completion interrupt handler.
>>
>> Basically, what was happening was:
>>
>>             Missed event
>>              |
>>              |
>>              V
>> SG1-SG2-SG3-Null
>>          \
>>           \__TC Interrupt (Almost same time as ARM is executing
>> TC interrupt handler, an event got missed and also forgotten
>> by clearing the EMR).
> 
> Sorry, but I dont see how edma_stop() is coming into picture in the race
> you describe?

In edma_callback function, for the case of DMA_COMPLETE (Transfer
completion interrupt), edma_stop() is called when all sets have been
processed. This had the effect of clearing the EMR.

This has 2 problems:

1.
If error interrupt is also pending and TC interrupt clears the EMR.

Due to this the ARM will execute the error interrupt even though the EMR
is clear. As a result, the following if condition in dma_ccerr_handler
will be true and IRQ_NONE is returned.

        if ((edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 0) == 0) &&
            (edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 1) == 0) &&
            (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_QEMR) == 0) &&
            (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_CCERR) == 0))
                return IRQ_NONE;

If this happens enough number of times, IRQ subsystem disables the
interrupt thinking its spurious which creates serious problems.

2.
If the above if statement condition is removed, then EMR is 0 so the
callback function will not be called in dma_ccerr_handler thus the event
is forgotten, never triggered manually or never sets missed flag of the
channel.

So about the race: TC interrupt handler executing before the error
interrupt handler can result in clearing the EMR and creates these problems.

>> The EMR is ultimately being cleared by the Error interrupt
>> handler once it is handled so we don't have to do it in edma_stop.
> 
> This, I agree with. edma_clean_channel() also there to re-initialize the
> channel so doing it in edma_stop() certainly seems superfluous.

Sure.

Thanks,

-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/