linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUX7aFAPBo_nhBLQ7-F465_Bujg5Cr5+xL+hfcwn6BMo=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:48:40 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davej@...hat.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, glommer@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here:
>
> http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/
>

"Current" is not precise enough... above tree has git-tags.
I guess you mean "v3.11-rc1-mmotm-2013-07-18-16-40" ?

As I am not a linux-fs expert I can try to test, preferably against a
Linux-next release.
Would you like to test against "vanilla" mmotm or is Linux-next
suitable in your eyes?

I have seen some typos... are you interested in such feedback?

- Sedat -

[1] http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/tag/?id=v3.11-rc1-mmotm-2013-07-18-16-40
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/