[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F8DE28.4000508@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:51:36 +0400
From: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/33] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec
07/31/2013 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton пишет:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:50:26 -0500 Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch series adds a kernel interface to fs/aio.c so that kernel code can
>> issue concurrent asynchronous IO to file systems. It adds an aio command and
>> file system methods which specify io memory with pages instead of userspace
>> addresses.
>>
>> This series was written to reduce the current overhead loop imposes by
>> performing synchronus buffered file system IO from a kernel thread. These
>> patches turn loop into a light weight layer that translates bios into iocbs.
> Do you have any performance numbers?
>
> Does anyone care much about loop performance? What's the value here?
>
>
OpenVZ uses loopback-device to keep per-container filesystems. We care
much about overhead introduced by loop: IO-bound applications run on top
of per-container filesystem shouldn't perform worse than on top of host
filesystem. So the value for us is zero overhead.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists