linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: clk rate-change notifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:30:45 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: clk rate-change notifiers

On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 10:09:03 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 July 2013 07:13, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Viresh Kumar (2013-07-07 21:10:54)
> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> > Removes direct handling of OPP tables and voltage regulators by calling
> >> > of_clk_cpufreq_notifier_handler, introduced by commit "clk: cpufreq
> >> > helper for voltage scaling".
> >> >
> >> > In the future this can help consolidate code found across similar
> >> > CPUfreq drivers.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 125 ++++++++---------------------------------
> >> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Good patch, really gets lots of stuff out from cpufreq drivers.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> >
> > Viresh,
> >
> > Thanks for the Ack. I received no comments on this series besides your
> > own, so I plan to merge it. Do you want to take patch #3, or do you want
> > me to take it, or should I give you and Rafael a stable branch instead?
> 
> Its only related to cpufreq-cpu0 and to handle dependencies well they
> should go through a single tree.. Probably your tree is the right place for
> now. Rafael?

Yes, the entire series should go through the Mike's tree I think.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/