[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOaiJ-mNE=1nuaPqd+qUZVsHakm1Mo-j40dXiTeN+nEVLXOvXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:54:03 +0530
From: vinayak menon <vinayakm.list@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arun KS <getarunks@...il.com>
Subject: ipv4: crash at leaf_walk_rcu
Hi,
A crash was seen on 3.4.5 kernel during some random wlan operations.
CPU: Single core ARM Cortex A9.
fib_route_seq_next was called with second argument (void *v) as
0xd6e3e360 which is a "freed" object of the "ip_fib_trie" cache. I
confirmed that the object was freed with crash utility.
Sequence: fib_route_seq_next->trie_nextleaf->leaf_walk_rcu
As "v" was a freed object, inside trie_nextleaf(), node_parent_rcu()
returned an invalid tnode. But as I had enabled slab poisoning and the
object was already freed, the tnode was 0x6b6b6b6b. And this was
passed to leaf_walk_rcu and resulted in the crash.
fib_route_seq_start, takes rcu_read_lock(), but free_leaf calls
call_rcu_bh. Can this be the problem ?
Should rcu_read_lock() in fib_route_seq_start be changed to rcu_read_lock_bh() ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PC is at leaf_walk_rcu+0x10/0xa0
LR is at fib_route_seq_next+0x58/0x74
pc : [<c0500e5c>] lr : [<c050108c>] psr: a0000013
sp : c150bee0 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000000
r10: 00000400 r9 : 53701020 r8 : c32345c0
r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : 00000002
r3 : 6b6b6b6b r2 : 00000001 r1 : d6e3e360 r0 : 6b6b6b6a
Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
Control: 10c53c7d Table: 835dc059 DAC: 00000015
Backtrace:
[<c0500e5c>] (leaf_walk_rcu+0x10/0xa0) from [<c050108c>]
(fib_route_seq_next+0x58/0x74)
[<c050108c>] (fib_route_seq_next+0x58/0x74) from [<c011c06c>]
(seq_read+0x2cc/0x438)
[<c011c06c>] (seq_read+0x2cc/0x438) from [<c0145734>] (proc_reg_read+0xb0/0xcc)
[<c0145734>] (proc_reg_read+0xb0/0xcc) from [<c0100798>] (vfs_read+0xac/0x124)
[<c0100798>] (vfs_read+0xac/0x124) from [<c0100848>] (sys_read+0x38/0x64)
[<c0100848>] (sys_read+0x38/0x64) from [<c000e100>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48)
Thanks,
Vinayak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists