linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: palmas: Add power off control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:58:38 -0500
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
CC:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"ian.campbell@...rix.com" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
	"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	"broonie@...aro.org" <broonie@...aro.org>,
	"j-keerthy@...com" <j-keerthy@...com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"ian@...mlogic.co.uk" <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mallikarjun Kasoju <mkasoju@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: palmas: Add power off control

On 07/31/2013 01:22 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 21:17 +0800, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 07/30/2013 07:05 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
[...]

>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt
>>> index 30b0581..4adca2a 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ Optional nodes:
>>>    	       ti,smps-range - OTP has the wrong range set for the hardware so override
>>>    	       0 - low range, 1 - high range.
>>>
>>> +- ti,system-power-controller: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling
>> controller or master?
>
> We name it controller since it controls the system power of the
> platform, I'm not sure will it make more sense to be master? Or does it
> makes sense to other pmic which also control the system power (the same
> property are already used in pmic TPS6586x and TPS65910).


No strong feelings either way, especially if there is precedence.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/