[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1375276989.695849188@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:23:09 +0200
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Harshula Jayasuriya" <harshula@...hat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: [69/84] nfsd: nfsd_open: when dentry_open returns an error do not
propagate as struct file
3.2.50-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Harshula Jayasuriya <harshula@...hat.com>
commit e4daf1ffbe6cc3b12aab4d604e627829e93e9914 upstream.
The following call chain:
------------------------------------------------------------
nfs4_get_vfs_file
- nfsd_open
- dentry_open
- do_dentry_open
- __get_file_write_access
- get_write_access
- return atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount) ? 0 : -ETXTBSY;
------------------------------------------------------------
can result in the following state:
------------------------------------------------------------
struct nfs4_file {
...
fi_fds = {0xffff880c1fa65c80, 0xffffffffffffffe6, 0x0},
fi_access = {{
counter = 0x1
}, {
counter = 0x0
}},
...
------------------------------------------------------------
1) First time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NULL, hence nfsd_open() is called where we get status set to an error
and fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] to -ETXTBSY. Thus we do not reach
nfs4_file_get_access() and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is not incremented.
2) Second time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NOT NULL (-ETXTBSY), so nfsd_open() is NOT called, but
nfs4_file_get_access() IS called and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is incremented.
Thus we leave a landmine in the form of the nfs4_file data structure in
an incorrect state.
3) Eventually, when __nfs4_file_put_access() is called it finds
fi_access[O_WRONLY] being non-zero, it decrements it and calls
nfs4_file_put_fd() which tries to fput -ETXTBSY.
------------------------------------------------------------
...
[exception RIP: fput+0x9]
RIP: ffffffff81177fa9 RSP: ffff88062e365c90 RFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: ffff880c2b3d99cc RBX: ffff880c2b3d9978 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: dead000000100101 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffffffffe6
RBP: ffff88062e365c90 R8: ffff88041fe797d8 R9: ffff88062e365d58
R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 0000000000000007 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
#9 [ffff88062e365c98] __nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa0562334 [nfsd]
#10 [ffff88062e365cc8] nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa05623ab [nfsd]
#11 [ffff88062e365ce8] free_generic_stateid at ffffffffa056634d [nfsd]
#12 [ffff88062e365d18] release_open_stateid at ffffffffa0566e4b [nfsd]
#13 [ffff88062e365d38] nfsd4_close at ffffffffa0567401 [nfsd]
#14 [ffff88062e365d88] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffa0557f28 [nfsd]
#15 [ffff88062e365dd8] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffa054543e [nfsd]
#16 [ffff88062e365e18] svc_process_common at ffffffffa04ba5a4 [sunrpc]
#17 [ffff88062e365e98] svc_process at ffffffffa04babe0 [sunrpc]
#18 [ffff88062e365eb8] nfsd at ffffffffa0545b62 [nfsd]
#19 [ffff88062e365ee8] kthread at ffffffff81090886
#20 [ffff88062e365f48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c14a
------------------------------------------------------------
Signed-off-by: Harshula Jayasuriya <harshula@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
@@ -782,9 +782,10 @@ nfsd_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
}
*filp = dentry_open(dget(dentry), mntget(fhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt),
flags, current_cred());
- if (IS_ERR(*filp))
+ if (IS_ERR(*filp)) {
host_err = PTR_ERR(*filp);
- else
+ *filp = NULL;
+ } else
host_err = ima_file_check(*filp, access);
out_nfserr:
err = nfserrno(host_err);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists