lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130731141841.GP5882@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:18:41 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [ARM ATTEND] arch/arm SoC organization

All,

I'd like to take the opportunity to discuss the layout/config of the arm
SoCs.  By the time the KS rolls around, we should have at least two or more
use-cases to present and discuss (mvebu, bcm).

Between devicetree and multiplatform the concept of board-specific code
is really disappearing in arm-land.  eg mach-kirkwood/ is almost fully
converted, within the next window or two, we'll be moving all of the DT
capable boards from kirkwood, orion5x, and dove over to mvebu.
mach-mvebu will then hold 5 different SoCs (it already has Armada 370
and Armada XP).

mach-bcm is in a similar situation (multi-SoC).  I'm sure there are
others (nvidia, ti, etc).

So, I'd like to propose we discuss some lessons learned and maybe arrive
at some best practices.  eg, should we just go with mach-$COMPANY/?  How
best to handle config symbols for efficient building?  Deprecation path
for legacy (unconverted) boards?

Also, to head off the demons, I am *not* proposing reorganizing
everything.  Merely to find some consensus and good ideas so that as
things merge together, we are mostly on the same page.

I'm sure we all have different ideas and I think it'd be good to hear
what everyone else is thinking.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ