[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1375280941-22657-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:29:01 +0200
From: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-stmp3xxx: provide timeout for potentially endless loop polling a HW bit
It's always a bad idea to poll on HW bits without a timeout.
The i.MX28 RTC can be easily brought into a state in which the RTC is
not running (until after a power-on-reset) and thus the status bits
which are polled in the driver won't ever change.
This patch prevents the kernel from getting stuck in this case.
Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c
index 767fee2..2601953 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/rtc.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
@@ -119,24 +120,39 @@ static void stmp3xxx_wdt_register(struct platform_device *rtc_pdev)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_STMP3XXX_RTC_WATCHDOG */
-static void stmp3xxx_wait_time(struct stmp3xxx_rtc_data *rtc_data)
+static int stmp3xxx_wait_time(struct stmp3xxx_rtc_data *rtc_data)
{
+ int timeout = 5000; /* 3ms according to i.MX28 Ref Manual */
/*
- * The datasheet doesn't say which way round the
- * NEW_REGS/STALE_REGS bitfields go. In fact it's 0x1=P0,
- * 0x2=P1, .., 0x20=P5, 0x40=ALARM, 0x80=SECONDS
+ * The i.MX28 Applications Processor Reference Manual, Rev. 1, 2010
+ * states:
+ * | The order in which registers are updated is
+ * | Persistent 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Alarm, Seconds.
+ * | (This list is in bitfield order, from LSB to MSB, as they would
+ * | appear in the STALE_REGS and NEW_REGS bitfields of the HW_RTC_STAT
+ * | register. For example, the Seconds register corresponds to
+ * | STALE_REGS or NEW_REGS containing 0x80.)
*/
- while (readl(rtc_data->io + STMP3XXX_RTC_STAT) &
- (0x80 << STMP3XXX_RTC_STAT_STALE_SHIFT))
- cpu_relax();
+ do {
+ if (!(readl(rtc_data->io + STMP3XXX_RTC_STAT) &
+ (0x80 << STMP3XXX_RTC_STAT_STALE_SHIFT)))
+ return 0;
+ udelay(1);
+ } while (--timeout > 0);
+ return (readl(rtc_data->io + STMP3XXX_RTC_STAT) &
+ (0x80 << STMP3XXX_RTC_STAT_STALE_SHIFT)) ? -ETIME : 0;
}
/* Time read/write */
static int stmp3xxx_rtc_gettime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *rtc_tm)
{
+ int ret;
struct stmp3xxx_rtc_data *rtc_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- stmp3xxx_wait_time(rtc_data);
+ ret = stmp3xxx_wait_time(rtc_data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
rtc_time_to_tm(readl(rtc_data->io + STMP3XXX_RTC_SECONDS), rtc_tm);
return 0;
}
@@ -146,8 +162,7 @@ static int stmp3xxx_rtc_set_mmss(struct device *dev, unsigned long t)
struct stmp3xxx_rtc_data *rtc_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
writel(t, rtc_data->io + STMP3XXX_RTC_SECONDS);
- stmp3xxx_wait_time(rtc_data);
- return 0;
+ return stmp3xxx_wait_time(rtc_data);
}
/* interrupt(s) handler */
--
1.7.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists