[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130731160553.GF3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:05:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Don Morris <don.morris@...com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched, numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups for
shared faults
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:45:09AM -0400, Don Morris wrote:
> > +
> > +static void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + kfree(p->numa_faults);
> > + if (p->numa_group) {
> > + struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group;
>
> See below.
>
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < 2*nr_node_ids; i++)
> > + atomic_long_sub(p->numa_faults[i], &grp->faults[i]);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&p->numa_lock);
> > + spin_lock(&group->lock);
> > + list_del(&p->numa_entry);
> > + spin_unlock(&group->lock);
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(p->numa_group, NULL);
> > + put_numa_group(grp);
>
> So is the local variable group or grp here? Got to be one or the
> other to compile...
Feh, compiling is soooo overrated! :-)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists