linux-kernel - Re: [for-next-3.11][PATCH 0/8] ftrace/tracing: Event file fixes and ftrace function hash fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1375288993.5418.1.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:43:13 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next-3.11][PATCH 0/8] ftrace/tracing: Event file fixes and
 ftrace function hash fixes

On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 16:22 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> That patch fixes the buggy debugfs_remove_recursive() and nothing else.

Cool, I just pulled it in, and added your test case as part of my test
suite.

> 
> The test-case from the changelog can trigger the problem with or without
> the recent changes. You can't (I hope) crash the kernel this way after
> these changes, but the undeleted directory is still obviously bad.
> 
> Just I think that "open/delete fixes" is not complete without this fix.

OK, I'll start running it through my tests and I'll be pushing it out
later today. I'm still waiting on a "tested-by" for one of my other
patches.

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/