linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] tracing: trace_remove_event_call() should fail if call/file is in use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130731173832.GA31099@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:38:32 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Alexander Z Lam <azl@...gle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] tracing: trace_remove_event_call() should fail
	if call/file is in use

On 07/31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 19:50 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Now we are ready to change trace_kprobe.c and trace_uprobe.c, Steven
> > already has the patches.
>
> Can you refresh my memory. My INBOX is quite full. What were the
> subjects for these patches?

Please see the attached mbox. And notice who is the author ;)
I also added the ack from Masami.

But if you only need the subjects:

	[RFC][PATCH 3/4] tracing/kprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are open
	[RFC][PATCH 4/4] tracing/uprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are open

Oleg.

View attachment "old.mbox" of type "text/plain" (20102 bytes)