[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375304106-zw8ye9cc-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:55:06 -0400
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] mm, hugetlb: do hugepage_subpool_get_pages() when
avoid_reserve
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:02:50PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:05:51PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > When we try to get a huge page with avoid_reserve, we don't consume
> > > a reserved page. So it is treated like as non-reserve case.
> >
> > This patch will be completely overwritten with 9/18.
> > So is this patch necessary?
>
> Yes. This is a bug fix, so should be separate.
> When we try to allocate with avoid_reserve, we don't use reserved page pool.
> So, hugepage_subpool_get_pages() should be called and returned if failed.
>
> If we merge these into one, we cannot know that there exists a bug.
OK, so you can merge this with the subpool accounting fix in 6/18
as one fix.
Thanks,
Naoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists