[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130801045958.GB6151@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:29:58 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] sched: Swap tasks when reschuling if a CPU on a
target node is imbalanced
> @@ -904,6 +908,8 @@ static int task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> src_eff_load *= src_load + effective_load(tg, src_cpu, -weight, -weight);
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(nid)) {
> + struct task_struct *swap_candidate = NULL;
> +
> dst_load = target_load(cpu, idx);
>
> /* If the CPU is idle, use it */
> @@ -922,12 +928,41 @@ static int task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> * migrate to its preferred node due to load imbalances.
> */
> balanced = (dst_eff_load <= src_eff_load);
> - if (!balanced)
> - continue;
> + if (!balanced) {
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> + unsigned long src_faults, dst_faults;
> +
> + /* Do not move tasks off their preferred node */
> + if (rq->curr->numa_preferred_nid == nid)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Do not attempt an illegal migration */
> + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(rq->curr)))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not impair locality for the swap candidate.
> + * Destination for the swap candidate is the source cpu
> + */
> + if (rq->curr->numa_faults) {
> + src_faults = rq->curr->numa_faults[task_faults_idx(nid, 1)];
> + dst_faults = rq->curr->numa_faults[task_faults_idx(src_cpu_node, 1)];
> + if (src_faults > dst_faults)
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The destination is overloaded but running a task
> + * that is not running on its preferred node. Consider
> + * swapping the CPU tasks are running on.
> + */
> + swap_candidate = rq->curr;
> + }
>
> if (dst_load < min_load) {
> min_load = dst_load;
> dst_cpu = cpu;
> + *swap_p = swap_candidate;
Are we some times passing a wrong candidate?
Lets say the first cpu balanced is false and we set the swap_candidate,
but find the second cpu(/or later cpus) to be idle or has lesser effective load, then we
could be sending the task that is running on the first cpu as the swap
candidate.
Then would the preferred cpu and swap_candidate match?
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists