| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:19:28 +1000 From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davej@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, glommer@...allels.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > This series of patches is against the curent mmotm tree here: > > > > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit/linux-mmotm.git/ > > > > "Current" is not precise enough... above tree has git-tags. It's most certainly precise. "current" always means the master branch at the time the series was posted. I.e. same definition as "top of tree".... > As I am not a linux-fs expert I can try to test, preferably against a > Linux-next release. > Would you like to test against "vanilla" mmotm or is Linux-next > suitable in your eyes? mmotm is based on the linux-next tree at the time the tree was made. > I have seen some typos... are you interested in such feedback? feel free to point them out. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@...morbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists