[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABpLfoi8gG5o6Qp2e8m1-GnP5+dKjH4bwDJorN+6g0EybXaa6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:18:44 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [QUERY] lguest64
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:39:23PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> There are plenty virtual machines in EC2, Rackspace, HP and other
>> clouds that do not have hardware virtualization. I believe that
>> running a hypervisor on them may be pretty interesting.
>
> Interesting how?
>
> How interesting is it really to run nested on a public
> surveillance^Wcloud platform vs say, using nested kvm on your own
> machine?
There are people that use public clouds^Wsurveliance platforms. Why do
they prefer these platforms over kvm on their own machines is another
question. But, it is their choice and their right to use whatever
platform they'd like. I've only suggested to provide them with ability
to use nested virtualizatoin on their platform...
> What are those very important use cases which warrant growing more of
> that pvops gunk^Wcreativity?
For instance, you can run several exact copies of OpenStack deployment
on Amazon EC2 :-)
> :-)
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists