linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging/lustre: lloop depends on BLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:41:49 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging/lustre: lloop depends on BLOCK

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:30:41AM +0800, Xiong Zhou wrote:
> From: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@...il.com>
> 
> First version of this patch makes LUSTRE_FS depends on BLOCK.  Second
> version makes only lloop depends on BLOCK with a config option for this
> dependence, and remove unnecessary jdb header files which depends on
> BLOCK.
> 
> This version removes the wrapper ll_unregister_blkdev which depends on
> BLOCK in header and just call unregister_blkdev in lloop.c based on Peng
> Tao's comment.

This isn't all needed in the patch changelog info, just say what it
does.

Also, it doesn't apply for some reason, care to refresh this against my
latest tree and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/