linux-kernel - Re: RFC: named anonymous vmas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130801083608.GJ221@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:36:08 -0400
From:	Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: named anonymous vmas

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:29:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, FreeBSD has an extension to shm_open to create unnamed but fd
> passable segments.  From their man page:
> 
>     As a FreeBSD extension, the constant SHM_ANON may be used for the path
>     argument to shm_open().  In this case, an anonymous, unnamed shared
>     memory object is created.  Since the object has no name, it cannot be
>     removed via a subsequent call to shm_unlink().  Instead, the shared
>     memory object will be garbage collected when the last reference to the
>     shared memory object is removed.  The shared memory object may be shared
>     with other processes by sharing the file descriptor via fork(2) or
>     sendmsg(2).  Attempting to open an anonymous shared memory object with
>     O_RDONLY will fail with EINVAL. All other flags are ignored.
> 
> To me this sounds like the best way to expose this functionality to the
> user.  Implementing it is another question as shm_open sits in libc,
> we could either take it and shm_unlink to the kernel, or use O_TMPFILE
> on tmpfs as the backend.

I'm not sure what the purpose is. shm_open with a long random filename
and O_EXCL|O_CREAT, followed immediately by shm_unlink, is just as
good except in the case where you have a malicious user killing the
process in between these two operations.

Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/