[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FA32CF.1090507@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:05:03 +0100
From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] DT/core: update cpu device of_node
On 22/07/13 12:32, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>
> As more and more information is getting added into the cpu node, the number
> of drivers needing to parse the device tree for CPU nodes are increasing.
> Most of the time, the information needed from the cpu node is preferred
> in the logical CPU order. Hence many drivers first parse and search the
> CPU node, match them to logical index if needed and then search for the
> required property inside a particular cpu node. Some of them assume the
> logical and physical CPU ordering to be same which is incorrect.
>
> This patch series initialises the of_node in all the cpu devices when
> registering the CPU device.
> 1. This avoids different drivers having to parse the cpu nodes to obtain
> different attributes like operating points, latency,...etc.
> 2. This handles different physical and logical cpu ordering which is not
> the case in current code.
> 3. Also all the cpu nodes will have their of_node initialised correctly.
> Currently different drivers assign them partially and incorrectly.
> 4. Removes all the reduntant parsing in various drivers.
>
> Changes v2->v3:
> 1. Added new OF helper to get of_node from the cpu logical index.
> With the use of this help, removed lots of duplicated code from
> cpufreq drivers.
> 2. Fixed issue with property length calculation in of_get_cpu_node.
> (previously had assumed of_get_property returns number of cells)
> 3. Changed return type of arch_match_cpu_phys_id to bool(as suggested by Nico)
> 4. Re-ordered patch 2 and 3, and few typo fixes.
> 5. Rebased on v3.11-rc2(to avoid any conflicts with __cpuinit* deletion)
>
> Changes v1->v2:
> 1. Moved most of arch_of_get_cpu_node to OF/DT core as of_get_cpu_node
> adding a provision for architecture specific hooks for matching
> logical and physical ids.
> 2. Extended removal of DT cpu node parsing to PPC cpufreq drivers
> 3. Added Acks from Viresh and Shawn
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> Sudeep KarkadaNagesha (16):
Hi Rob,Olof,Rafael,
Since these changes are spread across multiple sub-systems, is it fine
if I split this and send pull request as below:
1. DT
of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index
ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id
driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture
of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index
2. ARM SoC(clearly specifying dependency on 1)
ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity
ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes
3. CPUFreq(clearly specifying dependency on 1)
cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Regards,
Sudeep
> arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 5 +++
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 61 ++++++++++---------------------
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 3 +-
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c | 52 +++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 2 ++
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 28 ++++-----------
> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c | 40 ++++++++-------------
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 23 +++---------
> drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c | 18 ++++------
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 +--
> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 8 +++--
> drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 23 ++----------
> drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 5 +--
> drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 47 ++++++------------------
> drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 4 +--
> drivers/of/base.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/of.h | 6 ++++
> include/linux/of_device.h | 15 ++++++++
> 18 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists