linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130801100956.GL9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:09:56 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Cc:	"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
	<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, mbizon@...ebox.fr,
	Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have
 people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 11:57:43AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 11:26 PM, jonsmirl@...il.com wrote:

> >Alternatively you may be of the belief that it is impossible to get
> >rid of the board specific code. But x86 doesn't have any of it, why
> >should ARM?

> Well, I am curious whether that will stay that way once x86 is truly
> moving into the embedded arena (if ever).

There's shipping phones using x86, they do actually have board code due
to their use of SFI.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)