[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FA569A.9080705@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:37:46 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@....fi>,
Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: USB for Tegra114 Dalmore
Hello.
On 01-08-2013 3:29, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> Don't they cause numerous resource conflicts while device nodes
>>>> being
>>>> instantiated as the platform devices?
>>
>>> No; the driver knows that the HW is screwy and there's lots of
>>> register-range sharing going on, so it simply maps the registers, rather
>>> than reserving the physical address range and mapping it.
>>
>> Yes, it's clear that the driver should take special measures, I was
>> asking about the platform device creation phase. What do you see in
>> /proc/iomem?
> The drivers don't request the memory region since doing so would cause
> conflicts. Hence, the regions don't show up in /proc/iomem.
Regions should show up after the platform device registration. They just
show up as subregions of those when you request them. That's why I asked for
your /proc/iomem.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists