[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22032fc7-81f5-4271-81b6-cd2bee277fb5@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:36:03 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] xen: introduce XENMEM_get_dma_buf and xen_put_dma_buf
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
>---
>include/xen/interface/memory.h | 62
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/xen/interface/memory.h
>b/include/xen/interface/memory.h
>index 2ecfe4f..ffd7f4e 100644
>--- a/include/xen/interface/memory.h
>+++ b/include/xen/interface/memory.h
>@@ -263,4 +263,66 @@ struct xen_remove_from_physmap {
> };
> DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xen_remove_from_physmap);
>
>+#define XENMEM_get_dma_buf 26
>+/*
>+ * This hypercall is similar to XENMEM_exchange: it exchanges the
>pages
Could you elaborate why the existing hyper call won't work?
>+ * passed in with a new set of pages, contiguous and under 4G if so
>+ * requested. The new pages are going to be "pinned": it's guaranteed
>+ * that their p2m mapping won't be changed until explicitly
>"unpinned".
>+ * If return code is zero then @out.extent_list provides the MFNs of
>the
>+ * newly-allocated memory. Returns zero on complete success,
>otherwise
>+ * a negative error code.
>+ * On complete success then always @nr_exchanged == @in.nr_extents.
>On
>+ * partial success @nr_exchanged indicates how much work was done.
>+ */
>+struct xen_get_dma_buf {
>+ /*
>+ * [IN] Details of memory extents to be exchanged (GMFN bases).
>+ * Note that @in.address_bits is ignored and unused.
>+ */
>+ struct xen_memory_reservation in;
>+
>+ /*
>+ * [IN/OUT] Details of new memory extents.
>+ * We require that:
>+ * 1. @in.domid == @out.domid
>+ * 2. @in.nr_extents << @in.extent_order ==
>+ * @out.nr_extents << @out.extent_order
>+ * 3. @in.extent_start and @out.extent_start lists must not
>overlap
>+ * 4. @out.extent_start lists GPFN bases to be populated
>+ * 5. @out.extent_start is overwritten with allocated GMFN bases
>+ */
>+ struct xen_memory_reservation out;
>+
>+ /*
>+ * [OUT] Number of input extents that were successfully exchanged:
>+ * 1. The first @nr_exchanged input extents were successfully
>+ * deallocated.
>+ * 2. The corresponding first entries in the output extent list
>correctly
>+ * indicate the GMFNs that were successfully exchanged.
>+ * 3. All other input and output extents are untouched.
>+ * 4. If not all input exents are exchanged then the return code
>of this
>+ * command will be non-zero.
>+ * 5. THIS FIELD MUST BE INITIALISED TO ZERO BY THE CALLER!
>+ */
>+ xen_ulong_t nr_exchanged;
>+};
>+DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xen_get_dma_buf);
>+
>+#define XENMEM_put_dma_buf 27
>+/*
>+ * XENMEM_put_dma_buf unpins a set of pages, previously pinned by
>+ * XENMEM_get_dma_buf. After this call the p2m mapping of the pages
>can
>+ * be transparently changed by the hypervisor, as usual. The pages are
>+ * still accessible from the guest.
>+ */
>+struct xen_put_dma_buf {
>+ /*
>+ * [IN] Details of memory extents to be exchanged (GMFN bases).
>+ * Note that @in.address_bits is ignored and unused.
>+ */
>+ struct xen_memory_reservation in;
>+};
>+DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xen_put_dma_buf);
>+
> #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_MEMORY_H__ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists