lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FA6E4E.2080001@citrix.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:18:54 +0200
From:	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC:	<xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-blkback: use bigger array for batch gnt
 operations

On 01/08/13 14:30, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 01/08/13 13:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Right now the maximum number of grant operations that can be batched
>> in a single request is BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST (11). This was
>> OK before indirect descriptors because the maximum number of segments
>> in a request was 11, but with the introduction of indirect
>> descriptors the maximum number of segments in a request has been
>> increased past 11.
>>
>> The memory used by the structures that are passed in the hypercall was
>> allocated from the stack, but if we have to increase the size of the
>> array we can no longer use stack memory, so we have to pre-allocate
>> it.
>>
>> This patch increases the maximum size of batch grant operations and
>> replaces the use of stack memory with pre-allocated memory, that is
>> reserved when the blkback instance is initialized.
> [...]
>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> [...]
>> @@ -148,6 +155,16 @@ static struct xen_blkif *xen_blkif_alloc(domid_t domid)
>>  			if (!req->indirect_pages[j])
>>  				goto fail;
>>  		}
>> +		req->map = kcalloc(GNT_OPERATIONS_SIZE, sizeof(req->map[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!req->map)
>> +			goto fail;
>> +		req->unmap = kcalloc(GNT_OPERATIONS_SIZE, sizeof(req->unmap[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!req->unmap)
>> +			goto fail;
>> +		req->pages_to_gnt = kcalloc(GNT_OPERATIONS_SIZE, sizeof(req->pages_to_gnt[0]),
>> +		                            GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!req->pages_to_gnt)
>> +			goto fail;
> 
> Do these need to be per-request? Or can they all share a common set of
> arrays?

No, we cannot share them unless we serialize the unmap of grants using a
spinlock (like we do when writing the reponse on the ring).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ